
Tolstoi) traz em si mesma uma espécie de mimese Romance de Zola, de Balzac, de Dickens, de “No entanto, a narrativa mais clássica (um He is a subject split twice over, doubly perverse.”


Now the subject who keeps the two texts in his field and in his hands the reins of pleasure and bliss is an anachronic subject, for he simultaneously and contradictorily participates in the profound hedonism of all culture (which permeates him quietly under the cover of an "art de vivre" shared by the old books) and in the destruction of that culture: he enjoys the consistency of his selfhood (that is his pleasure) and seeks its loss (that is his bliss). Text of bliss: the text that imposes a state of loss, the text that discomforts (perhaps to the point of a certainīoredom), unsettles the reader's historical, cultural, psychological assumptions, the consistency of his tastes, values, memories, brings to a crisis his relation with language. “Text of pleasure: the text that contents, fills, grants euphoria the text that comes from culture and does not break with it, is linked to a comfortable practice of reading.
